|
BROCKHALL VILLAGE LTD.
REVITALIZING THE RURAL COMMUNITY
It is easy to forget what rural communities used to feel
like. Their basic building block was the farm; an owner-managed
business, where the owner lived, worked and employed a
handful of local people. Farmers clustered together and,
as well as competing with each other, they co-operated
to their mutual benefit. They built strong communities
because they needed strong communities.
It was this working community that gave the countryside
its distinctive "feel". So attractive was that "feel" that
successful urban businesspeople often sought to buy into
it. Though their businesses remained in town and they did
their earning and spending there, they started to commute
by car to homes in the countryside. We now realise that
this process was unsustainable. Agriculture was in long
term decline, in any event, and, gradually, the countryside
started to lose its "feel" and turn into a dormitory.
In the process, the rural community weakened and it is
weakening still.
Gerald Hitman and his team believe that there are three
contemporary trends which, if harnessed together, can begin
to reverse that process and militate towards the common
good. Indeed, so sure are they that it can be done that
they have completely refocussed their company, Brockhall
Village Ltd., on the project.
The model they have adopted is the working farm; an owner
managed business, where the owner lives, works and employs
a handful of local people. It is designed particularly
to suit brownfield employment sites in open countryside
which have failed to attract conventional redevelopment.
It aims to bring modern, high quality, employment opportunities
to these countryside sites in a way that is sustainable
and rebuilds the community.
The proposal is to build clusters of high quality homes,
each with an office or studio building, at the bottom of
the garden, suitable for four or five people to work in.
Each cluster is to be served by a central facility to serve
common needs for meetings, exhibitions, video-conferencing
and simple networking. This central facility is to be run
by a Cluster Co-ordinator, perhaps best seen as the successor
of the branch secretary of the NFU. As well as promoting
the interests of the businesses in the cluster, the co-ordinator
would have a vital role in doing research on the success
of the scheme in promoting high quality rural employment,
reducing the number and length of motorised journeys and
the regeneration of rural community facilities. Because
of the importance of this research function, Brockhall
Village Ltd. would fund each co-ordinator post for a minimum
of three years and collaborate with The Live Work Network,
Economic Development Officers and other partners in managing
the post.
The proposal offers a robust and common-sense solution
to the apparent conflict between the need to reduce the
number and length of motorised journeys by concentrating
development in the main centres of population and the equally
valid need to sustain the rural economy and promote real
communities.
The model is rooted in research carried out by Tim Dwelly
of the Live Work Network with the support of the Office
of the Deputy Prime Minister, The Housing Corporation,
The Peabody Trust and others.
Developments in information and communications technology,
a growing desire to achieve an improved work-life balance
and an increasing committment to environmental responsibility
have led to a mushrooming of the trend towards working
from home, particularly in the countryside. In the early
stages of business development, this has not required new
property types. Homeworkers have simply bought a home in
the countryside and settled down to work in the study,
the kitchen or around the dining room table.
To be sure, there have been drawbacks to this lifestyle.
Principal amongst them have been:-
- Personal isolation brought about by a lack of clustering
- A blurring of boundaries between work time and
family time
- Restraint on growth brought about by the need to
preserve some privacy in the home
- Real difficulties for children distinguishing between
home space and their parents' workspace.
Critically, home run businesses tend to hit an insurmountable
obstacle at the point at which they need to take on their
first non-family employee. To have a stranger in the home
for thirty five hours a week, every week, is simply too
much to bear.
The Brockhall Village model addresses each of these drawbacks
directly:-
- Each development, has the critical mass to constitute
a business cluster and support a co-ordinator
- The boundary between work time and family time
and work space and family space is concretized by the
walk down the garden
- Staff and customers do not enter the home and are
not even visible from it.
The model will liberate home-based businesses to employ
staff and, as such businesses are concentrated in the high
paid sectors of ICT, design, professional and financial
services, to re-invigorate the rural economy.
As well as enabling home-based rural businesses to grow,
the Brockhall Village model will also draw successful urban
businesses into the countryside, in a sustainable way.
England is replete with small businesses, in the sectors
enumerated above, in which the owner and the three or four
employees already live in the countryside and each spend
ten to fifteen hours a week driving into business premises
in the towns. Not only do such people resent the waste
of their time but many feel their lifestyle is socially
irresponsible. Top end estate agents report high levels
of enquiries for homes with outbuildings suitable for conversion
to offices or studios. Regrettably, they also report overwhelming
drop-out levels as prospective buyers realize the problems
they will face with planning procedures, services, conversion
costs etc. The Brockhall Village model will provide a ready
made solution to their needs - with the added benefits
of clustering and co-ordination.
A NOTE FROM THE AUTHOR OF THIS PAGE
"In my parish of Dinckley, in the Ribble Valley of Lancashire, there
were fourteen working dairy farms just twenty years ago. Now there are two. A
few hundred yards from where I sit, as I draft this document, is a redundant
church and, a little further on, is a redundant pub. Every morning, there is
a traffic jam where the road from the village joins the A59. It is made up of
people driving to their jobs in towns between seven and forty miles away. More
than half of the economically active population of the borough does the same.
When the decline in agriculture started, the Council did
its best to promote alternatives. It allocated forty acres,
right on the A59, for offices and factories. They called
it the Ribble Valley Enterprise Park and arranged for a
stretch of the road to be dualled and a new roundabout
to be built to improve the access. Fifteen or more years
after the allocation was made, just over 1.000 square metres
of offices are now occupied there. More or less everyone
who works there arrives by car.
In my village, there are about three hundred homes. 17%
of the economically active population works wholly from
home and my house is designed for live work. Seven people
are employed in the business here. Four of us live in the
village and arrive at work on foot. One lives in a neighbouring
village and has a very short drive to work. One has a twenty
minute drive to work. Interestingly, she is currently planning
to move to the village. One person lives eleven miles away
and does not intend to move.
The initiative of the people who live and work in the village
has led to the establishment, in the last three years,
of a small hotel, a restaurant, a commercially run day
nursery, a youth club and an effective and very active
residents association. People here are still not interested
in the redundant church but just about the whole village
turns out for carol singing under the village Christmas
tree. There has not been a burglary in the village for
ten years.
It is a wonderful place to live and work and I want to
make it even better. There are eight acres in the village
that remain to be developed. Two acres are allocated for
up to 39 dwellings and will be snapped up as soon as they
hit the market. Six acres are allocated for employment
and there is no interest in them at all. My prayer is that
the whole eight acres will be used for 39 live work units
with space in each for five people to work; the modern
equivalent of 39 quite large dairy farms. The economic benefits
to the district are obvious, the community building effects
will be more dramatic still and the effect on the number
and length of motorized journeys will also be large.
I want to do it here and to spread the idea through the
country."
Gerald Hitman
|